Press and Politics essays

Press and Politics expositions Perspectives of various press to the withdrawal of the counter disruption bill In this undertaking, we are going to investigate various perspectives of various papers in HK to the debate issue C withdrawal of the counter disruption charge, which started huge road dissents and set off the region's most exceedingly terrible political emergency since 1997. To make it more clear, it is a delay of the enactment methodology of the national security bill just, yet not a dropping of the Article 23. In the first place, we can investigate the publication of MingPao (see reference article no.1) on 2003-09-06. All things considered, we can see the general disposition of papers in Hong Kong hold mentalities pretty much comparative.  ¡Ã¢ °Ã¢ ¡Ã¢ ­Ã£Å¾Ã£'æ'ã™â ³Ã£â€°  Ã¢ ¡Ã£ ¹Ã¢ ¾Ã¢ ¡23-l⠡⠭â ¡  ¡Ã¢ °Ã¢ ¡Ã¢ ­ We bolster the enactment of the Article 23 in the Basic Law  ¡Ã¢ ­Ã¢ ¡ MingPao bolster the enactment, however more counsel and thought is required before the usage.  ¡Ã¢ °Ã¢ ¡Ã¢ ­Ã¢ ³Ã£ËœÃ¢â‚¬ ¡Ã£ ¸Ã¢ °Ã¢ ²Ã¢ ²Ã£ Ã¢ °Ã¢ ¸Ã¢ ¡Ã¢ ­Ã£Å¡Ã£â€¡Ã£Æ'㠷ãâ€"Ç⠵ã„㠻㠏ã‡â °Ã¢ ¸Ã£â€ºÃ£Ë†Ã£â€¹Ã¢ µÃ£â€žÃ£'iÃ¥ ⠡â ¡  ¡Ã¢ °Ã¢ ¡Ã¢ ­ the withdrawal of the national security charge  ¡Ã¢ ­ is shrewd, it meets the desire of Hong Kong Peopleâ ¡ In this way, the deferment of the bill is invited, and they for the most part figure it can do merchandise to the economy.  ¡Ã‚ °Ã‚ ¡Ã‚ ­ÃƒÅ½Ãƒ'Æ'ÕJÃ… ¾ÃƒÅ'Ø...^Õà ¾Ã‚ ¸ÃƒË†Ã‚ ²Ãƒâ€°iÇà ÃƒÅ Ã‚ ¡23-lãÿ^⠳ãÅ"ã‹ã ¹Ã¢ ¸Ã¢ µÃ£â€žeã•'⠏ã˜â µÃ£â€" ¸Ã£â€žÃ£â€"Æ'ã†ã† Çãã'⠼⠳â ¡ Äã'ãÆ'⠵ã„ãâ€"à ·iLi Ãƒâ€¹Ãƒâ€ Ã‚ µÃƒâ€žÃƒâ€¢Ãƒ ¾Ãƒâ€"ÃŽÅ ¾Ãƒâ€žyßà ¾^m ³F ¡  ¡Ã¢ °Ã¢ ¡Ã¢ ­ if the administration doesn't change its working style of  ¡listening to the supporters voice only⠡â ¯,  ¡making everybody either frie... <!